Ian Davison, Green Action in and around Leamington Spa!

Council Reject Clarendon Arcade

iandavison — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:15:23 +0000

Tonight, Warwick District Council rejected the application by 6 votes to 4 to build Clarendon Arcade, despite the recommendation from their officers that it should go ahead. Objecting to the scheme, I pointed to online shopping leading to loss of town centre shops plus the Royal Priors’ concern that this Arcade would pull trade away from the rest ofLeamington. The committee was moved by the local resident to spoke passionately about the impact of a 5 metre wall one metre from her garden. Overall, I think this proposal was rejected because it was too big, intruded on neighbours and is not in keeping with the area. The chairman, councillor Illingworth, summed it up by saying he wanted to approve the scheme to developLeamington, but couldn’t.

Brilliant news, but of course the developers will be back…

Clarendon Arcade plan is based on fantasy figures

iandavison — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:01:33 +0000

Today, the Courier printed this letter from me explaining that the plan to build Clarendon Arcade is based on ridiculous projections:

Numerous letters in the Courier have been from local residents saying there is no need for Clarendon Arcade, a proposed shopping precinct three times bigger than the Chandos St car park. So, why does the council think we need this arcade when there are so many empty shops?

The answer is buried in a Retail and Leisure Study by Strategic Perspecti>es LLP that the council commissioned. Published in 2009, it tried to predict whetherLeamingtonwould need more shops by 2016. It assumed that population would rise by 10.3%, demand for comparison (luxury) goods would rise each year, beginning slowly then at 3% per year by 2016. Surprisingly, it also assumed that there would be very little impact from online shopping, changing by only 1.7% over these 7 years. In addition, it assumed that there were no large development sites withinLeamingtonso it ignored potential areas like the Ford Site.

In short, it assumed that there would be more people, all spending more money and so concluded that we need more shops!? It may have been possible to accept these assumptions at the time; but with other developments happening withinLeamington and continued economic problems, the council’s insistence that we need Clarendon Arcade is simply not credible.

See http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7FCB23C7-29A1-4DD9-9C53-83FB81DCB4ED/0/Volume_1Warwick_Retail_Study_2009REDUCED.pdf

Debate on Warwick District Elections

iandavison — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:52:49 +0000

Today, I was involved in an election debate on BBC Coventry and Warwickshire with John Barrott (Labour), Michael Doody (Conservative) and Bernard Kirton (Independent): http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00g4wys/Annie_Othen_26_04_2011/ .

Due to start at 10am, 2 of them lost their way, so we started late. This made everything rushed and it impossible to rebuff rather strange allegations e.g. Bernard said I should focus on the District Council issues, then started talking about falling crime (which has far more to do with police that the council). However, I’m delighted that they all tried to responded to comments that I made such as our aims are to improve health and prosperity without spending our way out of recession.

UN Questions

iandavison — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:49:02 +0000

Today I was on a ‘Question Time’ panel at the Warwick District UN association meeting http://www.una.org.uk/about.html.

Topics included nuclear and other disarmaments, renewable energies, addressing basic development needs, and how the UN can help in conflicts such as currently inLibyaand chronically in Israel/Palestinian.

Of course there are lots of technical details, but I’m convinced that the key to solving these huge problems is living within our means and equity i.e. reducing the gap between rich and poor… here in theUK, we should start by closing this gap within our shores.

The Greenest Government Ever?

iandavison — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:39:26 +0000

This debate organised by Friends of the Earth was held today at the Dormer Place Conference Centre. Chris White, MP, said that the government simply had to be the greenest ever given the threat of climate change. Matthew Rhodes, director of Encraft, felt the government was trying to be green, but currently going backwards as the Green Investment Bank would have too little money and that low carbon activities must be seen as our economic future. David Powell, Friends of the Earth, also gave the government a mixed verdict: great abandoned the third runway at Heathrow and are introducing the Green Deal; but there are massive funding cuts for Green institutions, warm front funding has been abolished and councils need a bigger role in making the Energy Bill succeed.

My view? Some hesitant steps in the right direction, but far too slow, and not even addressing the fundamental issues; David Powell summed it up as a need for transformational change… but what this might be wasn’t even hinted at!

Cuts to Race Equality

iandavison — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:20:01 +0000

Warwickshire Race Equality Partnership (WREP http://www.wrep.org.uk ) held a BME consultation forum yesterday in the Sikh Cultural Community Centre, Queensway. With a 23% cut to the Police and 27% cut to library services, the ‘consultation’ is all about coping with cuts.

As the council is stopping funding of day care centres for the elderly, community groups will probably have to close. There was concern that this would disproportionately disadvantage minority ethnic groups: many in these communities rely on the centres for advice.

More positively, it was great to hear about the ‘virtual ward’ which manages to keep high risk people out of hospital.

Green Deal on the Politics Show

iandavison — Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:36:36 +0000

The Politics Show, shown today and at http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00zny47/The_Politics_Show_West_Midlands_20_03_2011/ was my first time on a TV panel. The 20 minute slot covered 3 topics. The Green Deal is the government’s watered down version of our Green New Deal; people are loaned money to insulate their houses and only payback out of the savings on their bills. It’s a great idea but is underfunded and lacking incentives.

The second topic was next week’s budget: proclaimed as pro-growth, but unemployment is projected to rise even higher and the worst public sectors cuts are still to come. The final topic was a strange idea of a permanent Conservative: Lib Dem coalition; but it allowed me to argue for proportional representation.

I was pleased the other panellists and BBC staff were so friendly, but there was lots of hanging around, make-up adjusted, told off for ruffling the carpet… and then a few seconds to make a point, when there were dozens I wanted to say: sound-bite politics in action!

Litter

iandavison — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:29:01 +0000

Today, the Green Party litter pick covered Eagle Rec, Ford’s Field, Queensway, Lee Road, around St Margaret Street shops through to Nursery St, Southway and Henley Road. Many of these areas looked as if they’d been recently covered, although there was still broken glass, cigarette butts along with bags and cans in the hedges. Others, however, looked badly neglected. For example, the play area in Eagle Rec was pretty good with several recently emptied bins, but Ford’s Field had just one overflowing bin and a vandalised play area. Also, there were four rats scavenging around a bin on Queensway.

Obviously the main problem is those who drop litter, making the local area less pleasant for everyone. However, it also looks as if the council could do better in some areas. Let me know if there are particular areas that concern you.

Is your Waste Collection Wonderful or Rubbish?

iandavison — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:18:24 +0000

Where I live, recycling and other waste are collected with little problem. However, many residents in Leamington have complained that waste collectors leave litter strewn around and the bins scattered across the pavement.

We’ve complained to the council about this happening in Kennan Avenue and they’ve promised to act. Let me know if action is needed where you live!

Is a sexual entertainment venue in Leamington objectionable?

iandavison — Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:36:34 +0000

This morning, I debated this issue live on BBC Coventry and Warwickshire with the owner of Shades ‘Gentleman’s club’ (the Trish Adudu show from about 2 hours 10 mins in).

The club has a bar with (clothed) pole dancing and private booths where clients can see topless (£10) or naked (£20) lap dancing. I agree with the report in Camden that lap dancing is a ‘fast fantasy’ that is demeaning to women http://www.childtrafficking.com/Docs/poppy_03_lap_dancing_0109.pdf . It also says that in Camden rapes and violent assaults increased dramatically when such clubs opened as they increase desire without satisfying it. In South Leamington, we’re told many residents feel less safe, but are reluctant to speak up. We’ve also spoken to shopkeepers close to the club who think it makes the area seedy and is bad for their trade.

This club is applying of a ‘Sexual Entertainment’ licence, so you can email the Council (David.Davies@warwickdc.gov.uk ) to support or oppose it by 6^th December: you must include your name and address and quote application number WDCSEL001.